Wed 27 Aug 2008
Industrial agriculture responsible for Listeria outbreak.
Posted by Nigel Tunnacliffe under Food , Public policy
Whether you are an American reader or a Canadian, I am certain that by now you have heard of the Listeria outbreak here in Canada. If not, here are the cliffnotes: so far 15 dead, 14 sick, and 31 more cases under investigation. The outbreak was centered around a macro scale animal slaughter and meat production plant owned and operated by Maple Leaf.
Why do I say that industrial agriculture is responsible? Blogger Lovable Liberal claims that meat production plants merely act as a vector, and that bacteria originates from an animal. While I agree, there would be no mass scale outbreak if it were not for the massive scale on which these food products are produced.
If we were still allowed to have micro-scale butchers, slaughtering and cutting up meat in their own shop, with a production capacity of only a few animals per day, this would never be a major issue. In fact, Listeria only affects the elderly, pregnant, and those with comparmized immune systems. Therefore it is likely that a single animal, or even a few animals that get infected in a small-scale facility could even go without harming anyone. It would go completely unnoticed. Is it any surprise that every serious outbreak occurs in macro-scale facilities? Yet government officials argue that production plants have to shoulder more responsibility for inspection (essentially privatizing food inspection). Greater requirements for industry self-regulation means that the costs are not economical for small scale producers.
The result is more of the same. More industrial agriculture, more mass-production of food, and more contamination outbreaks.
August 27th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Nigel, thanks for the link. I agree that industrial agriculture dramatically widens the impact of each outbreak. However, an epidemiologist I once knew was sure that outbreaks are much more common from small plants than from large ones. So I’m not sure the rate of cases per population is lower with small shops. For one thing, if there are enough of them to meet current levels of demand, they are essentially uninspectable. Of course, against that, current large plants in the U.S. are poorly inspected, too.
These are empirical questions. I don’t have the data, and I’d like to. There might be a sweet spot of size, though I doubt that it’s in the low range of a few animals per day.
lovable liberals last blog post..Not news, but still an outrage
August 27th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
I don’t have any hard facts to back up my assertion either, but Michael Pollan did write that contamination outbreaks are far more common in large-scale facilities. You do make a good point about the number of small scale facilities required to fill the demand… I think we should be able to choose which size of plant to get our meat from, then we can take our chances based on what we believe is safest.
By the way, great blog. I’ve been following US politics a lot more lately, since Canadian politics are a little less interesting as of late.